OSVDB的人从以前的老CVE里面翻出来几个比较有意思的. 尤其现在回过头来,看10年前的CVE,

早期CVE是通过投票来决定是否收录某一个漏洞.

可以点开具体看看: 倒数第2个就比较搞

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=1999-0345 - CVE contributors can be stumped

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=1999-0465 - Client side vulnerabilities aren't an issue.

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=1999-0285 - No reference, no problem!

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=1999-0549 - ISS tried desperately to help.

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=1999-0684 - A CVE entry can be a duplicate of itself.

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2000-0151 - We miss colorful CVE commentary.