阅读考研
百度空间 | 百度首页 
 
文章列表
 
2007-08-27 22:59

他在书中写道,在19世纪初期,世界陷入了一个马尔萨斯陷阱(这是以英国经济学家托马斯?马尔萨斯(Thomas Malthus)命名的,他认为人口增长会导致这个世界出现食物与其它资源的匮乏)。知识方面的缓慢进步没能提高收入;反而是刺激了人口的增长。在18世纪,大多数英国人还忍受着和石器时代大体相当的生活水准。富裕生活被自动抵消:就经济规律而言,人和动物没有什么区别。

从英国开始,有两件事情使西方跳出了这个陷阱。经济效率开始更为迅速

 
2007-08-25 07:59

Until the early 19th century, he writes, the world was caught in a Malthusian trap (after the English economist Thomas Malthus, who argued that population growth would starve the world of food and other resources). Slow advances in knowledge failed to drive incomes up; they spurred growth in population instead. Most people in 18th century England endured a standard of living roughly equivalent to that of the stone age. Abundance was self- cancelling

 
2007-08-23 13:01

在《枪炮、病菌与钢铁》(Guns, Germs, and Steel)一书中,贾德?戴蒙(Jared Diamond)对长期发展提出了一个令人惊诧却又可能立刻让人认同的论点。西方走向繁荣,而其它地区未能做到,原因在于地理环境。由于它们(得天独厚)的地理位置,欧洲和它的美国分支拥有易于驯养和栽培的动植物、较轻的疾病负担以及有利于工业化的自然资源。工业革命发端于英国,随后蔓延到欧洲大陆和美国,都是因为运气好。

将于下月出版的一本新书辩称,戴蒙完全搞

 
2007-08-22 22:00

In

Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond made a surprising yet instantly plausible argument about long-term development. The west grew rich and the rest did not because of geography. Thanks to where they were, Europe and its North American offshoots had plants and animals that were easy

 
2007-08-21 19:57
也谢谢在过去的日子里,在东方所有见过的支持我的同学们:)
 
2007-08-16 15:26

渣打银行(Standard Chartered)亚洲研究主管尼古拉斯?关(Nicholas Kwan)表示:“那些制定了产业政策的政府遇到了需要关注整个产业的问题。你需要在行业内进行考察,在这里你能找到细分市场——在这方面企业比政府更加擅长。”

他提到了第一代亚洲经济“小虎”不同的经历,以及它们如何应对竞争的故事。香港和韩国基本上都允许制造企业接受不可避免的竞争,然后将它们的低成本业务外包到海外,目的地通常是中国内地;部分出于政治原因,台湾

 
2007-08-15 22:31

Nicholas Kwan, head of Asian research at Standard Chartered, says: “Those governments with an industrial policy have encountered the problems of looking at whole industries. You need to look within industries, at where you can find a niche – and businesses are better at doing that than governments are.”

He points at the differing experiences of the first generation of the Asian “tiger” economies and

 
2007-08-08 21:58

中国的崛起激起了一场贸易和发展经济学界的古老争论:政府是否应当采取干预措施,培育初生的产业。

对于这种“产业政策”的拥护者而言,向价值链上端迈进的迫切需要只是加大了要求政府干预,帮助创造

具有竞争优势的产业集群和新产业的呼声。对于其反对者而言,科技的迅速变化和全球供应链的分割状态

意味着,即使这种体系在过去奏效,现在也

 
2007-08-08 21:54
同时也欢迎天益的新同学们:)
 
2007-08-06 19:37

The rise of China has stoked an old debate in trade and development economics: whether governments should intervene to nurture nascent industries. For fans of such “industrial policy”, the urgent need to go up the value ladder only increases the argument for intervention to help create clusters and new industries with a competitive edge. For its opponents, the rapid changes in technology and fragmentation of global supply chains mean that, even if

 
     
 
 
个人档案
 
readky

上次登录:
2007年 8月
加为好友
 
   
 
最新照片
 
   
 
订阅我的空间
 
已有人次访问本空间
 
订阅RSS  什么是RSS?

您也想拥有这样的空间?请点此申请。
     


©2009 Baidu